This article has been updated to include a statement from NDP MLA Ronna-Rae Leonard.
There’s a new water controversy bubbling up in the Comox Valley, and once again the province has dumped another problem on local elected officials.
The B.C. government has approved a controversial groundwater licence for a water extraction and bottling operation on a two hectare property on Sackville Road in the Merville area. They did it despite a strong objection from the Comox Valley Regional District and without public consultation or regard for community concerns.
“The province does this all the time,” said Area B Director Rod Nichol. “We have to clean up the mess and look like the bad guys.”
Nichol compared the water extraction issue to the recent Raven Coal Mine battle and myriad less high-profile issues, such as highway development.
About 200 people attended the CVRD’s Electoral Areas Services Committee meeting Monday (March 5) to protest and urge the CVRD to deny the water extraction applicants a necessary zoning change. The property is current zoned rural residential and would need to be zoned light industrial.
FURTHER READING: CVRD Staff Report
Instead, the committee unanimously endorsed a staff recommendation to refer the rezoning application to various agencies, CVRD committees and K’omoks First Nations. The intent is to build a baseline of data about the source of water (aquifer 408) and how a water bottling operation might impact agriculture and other existing users and potential long-term effects on the surrounding watershed.
NDP MLA Ronna-Rae Leonard emailed this statement to Decafnation:
“I can understand the concerns of Merville residents, as water is a precious resource for any community. My understanding is the ministry performed a detailed technical review of the proposal and noted no concerns about aquifer capacity. I’ve also been reassured that existing well users would get priority in a drought. The project still needs CVRD zoning approval though, and as the local MLA I will be monitoring the situation closely.”
The applicants
Christopher Scott MacKenzie told the committee that he originally drilled a well for domestic purposes. But after his wife, Regula Heynck, insisted on testing and discovering the water had high pH levels (alkaline), the couple envisioned a viable family business.
MacKenzie claimed the alkaline water has health benefits and is “something the community needs … it’s really unique”
A protester disrupted MacKenzie with concerns about how neighbors’ drinking supplies might go dry. He replied that dry wells would be “hit and miss,” and that people “would just have to understand it.”
FURTHER READING: Alkaline water: beneficial or bogus?; Quackwatch
MacKenzie and Heynck have recently moved to the Valley from Ringenberg, Germany, and took out a building permit to locate a $14,613 mobile home on the property.
MacKenzie is the son of the late Keith MacKenzie, who served as president of the Courtenay Fish and Game Club after retiring as carpentry foreman from Candian Forces Base, Comox. His tours of duty included a stop in Germany.
The core issue
The province has already approved a groundwater licence that enables MacKenzie/Heynck to extract 10,000 litres per day or 3.65 million litres per year. But the CVRD must approve a rezoning application to permit “water and beverage bottling” as a principal use on the property.
Alana Mullaly, the CVRD manager of planning services, said the province has jurisdiction on what happens below grade. The CVRD has jurisdiction over what can happen above grade.
She said denying the rezoning application would not cancel the provincial groundwater license.
Without a zoning change, MacKenzie/Heynck cannot conduct water bottling operations as the principal use of the property.
But it’s unclear whether a denial of the rezoning application would mean only that they could not construct a bottling facility on the property or that they could not operate a commercial enterprise from the property even without a physical structure.
The CVRD opposed the water extraction application made to Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development (FLNRORD) on the basis that it was inconsistent with the Rural Comox Valley Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 337, 2014, and the zoning bylaw.
There are environmentally sensitive areas surrounding the property, including many farms and Agricultural Land Reserve areas that rely on groundwater.
Area C Director Edwin Grieve warned that aquifers eventually get pumped down and he wondered what effect that would have on the water supply for nearby farms. He noted that climate changes have caused Portuguese Creek to dry up in the summer.
Grieve said the applicant deserved due process and that the gathering of more information is important.
But Grieve also said earlier that “we could save the applicant a lot of time and money and deny it now.”
What’s next
CVRD staff will refer the rezoning application to a number of agencies, First Nations and its own relevant committees. Not date was set for staff to report to the CVRD board.
If the application passes through the Area C Advisory Planning Commission, then the CVRD would hold public hearings.
In the meantime, people can express their views on the proposal to Tanya Dunlop, senior authorizations technologist, at tanya.dunlop@gov.bc.ca.
I have already made this comment of FB. If this were oil they were bottling in plastic bottles, we would have had picketers 3 people deep outside the meeting hall.
Are we giving away our precious water without due thought to the long term consequences?
And for questionable purposes? Most experts agree that alkaline water has no more significant health benefit than tap water.
This proposal has a greater impact than we might think, and one that cannot be traced. When a well dries up, people have to find other ways to get their water. Many people buy water from water trucks that come and fill their wells from water that comes from Comox Lake, or another aquifer. If there was a water advisory at the same time, people on wells would have to buy drinking water for themselves and livestock too. Additionally, if the water does dry up in a drought (which would be hard to prove and would have to rely on the family’s good faith in stopping), they can just suck up more water at a different time. They are not able to take more than 10,000 litres a day, but they can take millions of litres over the year . This could extend the water shortages beyond the governmentally declared ‘drought’, potentially causing water challenges in drought shoulder times.
Allowing water extraction for questionable purposes opens a Pandora’s Box full of unintended consequences.
One day when your in the Views…I will bring you the best artesian water for you to enjoy. Just because you don’t like it, does not mean it’s wrong.
Hi Scott — I’m not saying it’s “wrong,” just that the health benefits are dubious. “Artesian” is just a fancy term for water with a high pH level, alkaline, which can help some people with acid reflux, but, aside from that, tap water is just as healthy.
False. We offer a sustainable, highest quality, found locally, site specific jewel that is being wasted at surface uncotrolled by neighboring property owners. We have become the stewards of a precious resource and will defend the merits of the license with clear and factual content and never distract from the end goal. Bringing the best water in the valley to people that can decide for themselves what they put in they’re bodies. Cvrd water is substandard and unreliable.
Not sure what you’re saying is false. At the CVRD hearing, you made claims of health benefits from high pH water. Those claims are dubious. Also, ‘artesian’ is a term for a specific type of aquifer that because of confined conditions will flow up and out freely. It does not specifically refer to the quality of the water.
For a career columnist and publisher you clearly have not put in any effort to find any actual science about ancient water. One google search will only provide you easy reading. Good answers are hard to find. Two Nobel prizes in science have been awarded on the complexities of alkaline water, but that would take actual effort on your part to find…..it clearly does not fit you narrative.
Scott — I wish that instead of making personal attacks you would debate this important issue on the facts. Please name the two people you mention who won Nobel Prizes for “studying the complexities of alkaline water.” If you are referring to Otto Warburg, the basis of his Nobel has been widely misrepresented. Read this article: https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/otto-warburg-cancer/
It’s not personal, your a media outlet to be held accountable. Exageration’s and bold text make not news.
Scott — Yes, Decafnation is accountable. And I stand behind everything we’ve printed on this topic. The only exaggerations here come from you. I’ll ask a second time: please name the people you say won Nobel Prizes for studying alkaline water.