The Week: Doing it right on the wrong side of town, CVRD gets a good result for wrong reasons
As voters and taxpayers, we hope our elected officials always do the right thing for the right reasons.
The Comox Valley Regional District did the right thing last week by terminating its contract with the Comox Valley Economic Development Society (CVEDS). But they did it for the wrong reasons.
The Economic Development Society was a poorly run service that clothed itself in secrecy, reported to no one but a few self-appointed friends and spent a lot of money for questionable community benefit. And in doing so, the society managed to disappoint, frustrate and antagonize broad sectors of the Comox Valley community.
That was the right reason to terminate this contract.
Hornby and Denman islands and the Village of Cumberland pulled their financial support for the CVEDS service many years ago because those taxpaying elected officials realized how little value they were getting for their money.
Regional directors from Courtenay and Areas A and B might have gotten there, too, but they were making a good faith effort to transform CVEDS into a modern and more relevant organization through — for the first time ever — serious oversight.
But the CVEDS contract was not terminated for its obvious lack of performance. It wasn’t terminated because it had lost its way many years ago by spending almost a third of its budget on a seafood festival that added nothing to the economic sustainability of local businesses beyond a slight uptick in restaurant reservations.
The society’s contract wasn’t terminated because it often claimed responsibility for things on which it actually had minimal impact. It wasn’t terminated because the society shunned accountability or that it failed to comply with requirements under the Societies Act. Or that it had trouble managing its money.
No, the regional district terminated the CVEDS contract because Comox council members objected to increased oversight and scrutiny. Comox councillors didn’t like the regional board setting goals for the society that targeted current problems, such as affordable housing for low-wage employees and familys’ access to child care.
Comox Councillor Ken Grant summed it up when he lectured Courtenay Councillor Wendy Morin about how elected officials should manage arms-length societies.
“That’s the thing about the independent governance model, you don’t get to tell them how to do their business. That’s been the problem from day one,” Grant said at the Feb. 9 regional board meeting.
Grant couldn’t have been more wrong.
When a local government creates an organization — as the regional district did by forming CVEDS in 1988 — that exists only because it receives more than $1 million in public funds annually, then the elected officials absolutely get to say what they want for their money. In fact, taxpayers expect their elected officials to set the big picture goals and to hold people accountable for achieving them.
Grant was right about one thing. The independent governance model has been the problem from day one. Day one being back in 1988. Since then the society has happily taken the public’s $1 million-plus every year and did whatever it wanted with the money. Past elected officials didn’t seem to care what they did.
What is truly amazing is that this bad example of political oversight took so long to blow up.
But don’t celebrate just yet
Just because the contract for economic development services gets voided later this year doesn’t mean Comox Valley taxpayers are off the hook.
The regional district wrote CVEDS a $400,000 check in January. That’s one-half of its 2021 funding. The expectation is that the society will continue to fulfil the majority of their 2021 work plan items, including the ones the Town of Comox finds so distasteful.
But, of course, the regional district has no means of ensuring that all or even most of the work will get done satisfactorily. What recourse does the CVRD have? The contract will terminate on Aug. 26 whether the work gets done or not.
The second half of the $800,000 CVEDS 2021 budget is scheduled for July. Will they automatically get another $400,000 for their last two months? Not necessarily, according to CVRD Chief Administration Officer Russell Dyson.
“CVEDS has various commitments in place to deliver services for economic development, tourism and visitors services, and destination marketing. The termination notice provides service to CVEDS for eight of the 12 months in 2021, therefore the second payment for 2021 will consider any adjustments to annual allocation for this adjustment, noting that some costs are annual whether the contract is terminated part way through the year,” he told Decafnation via email.
Dyson confirmed that the regional district would not be responsible for any severance pay for CVEDS employees because they are not CVRD employees.
But Comox Valley taxpayers might become responsible for the Visitors Centre, which some people call the “drum” building and others call the White Elephant.
According to Dyson, “Upon the wind up of CVEDS, the net assets after payment of liabilities is transferred to CVRD and the participant member municipalities. The ongoing ownership and operation of the Visitors Centre will be a key consideration of the service participants in determining future service priorities.”
Dyson says the CVRD and municipal partners will be meeting and working with CVEDS staff the next few months to “encourage” that the work plan priorities are delivered and to encourage a smooth transition to a future service delivery determined through the service review.
“The second payment amount will be determined through this collaborative work over the next few months,” he said.
So what will rise from the ashes of CVEDS?
How will local governments provide destination marketing, handle visitor services, manage the hotel tax money and encourage economic vibrancy?
Given that Cumberland and the islands are doing just fine managing their own economic prosperity in-house — as most other communities on Vancouver Island already do — the ideal scenario now is that Courtenay and Comox will hire their own economic development officers.
The CVRD should also hire an economic officer to focus on the three electoral areas because it’s too easy for the rural areas’ needs to be overshadowed by the municipalities. They may all feel strongly about food security, but there are different projects that need to take place in different areas.
Then all four of the Valley’s economic development officers can meet monthly to share information and work together where it’s possible.
Meanwhile, all local governments should agree to share the contract for destination marketing and visitor services to Tourism Vancouver Island (about $260,000 per year). The City of Courtenay economic development officer should have input to Tourism Vancouver Island about how local MRDT funds are spent because all of that money comes from the city.
Every community’s needs will evolve over time
But no matter how our elected officials propose to meet those needs, they must always favour transparency and accountability and ensure their objectives are being met without favouritism and for the benefit of the greatest number of people.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
The Week: Give us full transparency when paid ‘volunteers’ work with CV students
Faith-based volunteers can contribute positively to the educational experience in our public schools but everyone must be perfectly clear about who they are, what they can and cannot do and school administrators must monitor their activity closely and consistently
What’s dire: the lack of Comox subdivisions or climate change and gradual deforestation?
A Comox Valley developer is suing the Town of Comox because his permits to cut down trees and build more single-family homes haven’t been issued as fast as he’s wanted and because the town wants a wider walking trail through the property
The Week: Ken Grant fined by Elections BC and Parksville confronted by development, water issues
Another Comox Councillor was fined by Elections BC for violating BC elections laws, plus Parksville’s water supply is unable to meet provincial requirements for summer water flow in the Englishman River let alone provide water for a proposed 800-unit development
THE WEEK: As Puntledge River goes lower, Colorado drinking recycled wastewater
A serious fall drought has reduced flows in the Puntledge River, shutting down hydroelectric power generation for the first time in 55 years. Meanwhile, many states eye sending treated wastewater to kitchen taps
THE WEEK: Let the people have a larger voice at Comox Valley council meetings
Making it easier for citizens to speak directly to municipal councils might increase public interest in local government, which in turn might encourage more registered voters to actually cast a ballot
The Week: Comox, Cumberland appointments pass, but no word on Courtenay … yet
Cumberland and Comox municipal councils approve their mayor’s annual appointments, but Courtenay was a no show at its inaugural meeting. Is there conflict behind the scenes?
The Week: Valley councils begin new terms, but will Comox ignore voters?
Dr. Jonathan Kerr topped the polls with voters, but will that resonate at the Comox Town Council as it is poised to approve new Mayor Nicole Minions’ appointments and assignments?
THE WEEK: Water supplies are good, fireworks are bad and where Daniel Arbour lives
Despite the long drought this summer, Comox Valley water system supplies have not been threatened; the BC Wildfire Service has banned fireworks this year and clarifying Daniel Arbour’s place of residence
Let’s put one of the craziest Comox Valley elections into the history book, and then close it
It was weird. But when the sun rose on Oct. 16, Comox Valley voters had made it clear they liked the direction charted by our local governments. In the municipalities, they elected all but two incumbents. In most races, the vote was a definite pat on the back for a job well done.
A few random items as the 2022 election comes to a close
Long-time public official Bronco Moncrief dies, Manno Theos hangs out in Greece, and Daniel Arbour reacts to lies about his campaign finances
We have other arms-length societies, under the Societies Act, in the Valley. Would we find abuses of “our” money there too? Time to start caring about how the funds are used and abused.
At least you can read, following the link you posted, the minutes of meetings held by this society. There seems to be a lot of secrecy among some societies. And having read a fair bit of the Societies Act on line and having spoken with a provincial employee, the Act seems to be enabling the idea “we can do what we want and what are you going to do about it”.
An example, Courtenay Recreation Association. They don’t hold public general meetings. I asked for the names of their board members. I was told it was none of my business. I asked to attend a meeting. I was told I was welcome and then the invite was rescinded. Need I carry on?
If public funds are received annually, doesn’t the public have any rights to have input? If so, then maybe that tourist information building might not have been built. Maybe the public is too indifferent to want to know how their tax dollars are being spent.
This commentary was very insightful for me. And I personally receive a failing grade for not having taken an interest earlier.
It means rather than face things as with the sense of honesty and absence of corruption, consider the cracks that may arise and be fair warning what seems perfect may be seriously flawed. All societies have issues but we don’t foot the bill for all of them. When taxpayers believe innocently that their funds are being spent wisely, then they better start praying.
The issue with CVEDS that’s different from a typical non profit society is that they were 100 % funded by taxpayer dollars. And did their best to hide their activities from the very people that funded them. I hear now that they are fighting numerous lawsuits, wasting more of our money. All ops normal! As Debbie said above, we’re all guilty for not paying attention and demanding more accountability for the millions that were spent with no visible result. The visitor center is a gem and should be retained but managed by someone other than CVEDS.
I like the photo!
Thanks, Bob. You can use it if you like. Just $10. 🙂
Well said, George!
Oh, by the way, I’ve always thought of the visitor center as a septic tank on land.
I thought its was the Ken Grant Investment Monument.
Thanks, Hugh. Above ground septic tank? I haven’t heard that one, but I like it.
No it is a liquor tank from a pulp mill. No one goes there because it not on a road to anywhere except Slegg Lumber.
Is Decafination able to share the full Work Plan so we as taxpayers have access to what is supposed to happen for the $800.000?
Thanks for the depth of coverage on this issue and the insights into wrong reasons. Affordable housing and childcare are KEY issues in economic development – just ask Vancouver where 30 somethings have left because they can’t buy a house or find someone to look after their kids. Our work force needs access to housing that is affordable and childcare services that work for their hours … or we won’t have the people we need to do the work! They will find another community where housing is more accessible and child care is available.
Hi Colleen — Here’s a link to the staff report from the Feb. CVRD meeting. If you scroll down the report, you’ll find the proposed 2021 work plan in detail.
http://agendaminutes.comoxvalleyrd.ca/Agenda_minutes/CVRDBoard/BRD/09-Feb-21/x550%20Dyson%20SR%20CV%20Ec%20Dev%20550.pdf
Hi George,
You have been raising this issue for some time. No doubt , you have had an influence.well done.
Who needs to sell the Comox Valley? The visitor centre is first class but out of the way – so what.
As far as councillors who see the need to hire their own economic development executive ,I say give them the boot, next election. A huge boot . A huge waste of taxpayers cash. Buy Stotem Falls instead. Invest in Park real estate for future generations and the huge influx that is coming
All elected folks here, 22, know that the CVRD has a professional public relations staff
Who can effectively represent the Comox Vallet to tourists and investors.
The question is , do we really need to promote the Comox Valley?
Does the photo have anything to do with the story?
Good question, Rosa. 🙂 The Week is a commentary, so it’s always a challenge (often a reach) to illustrate ideas and opinions. I’ve been collecting images from the markings on city streets for some time. When I looked through my archive of images, this one caught my eye because it looked like a broken cross to me. A broken promise. Maybe how the dogmatic gets worn down over time and reaches a point where it just cracks. It felt a little like the topic of this commentary. But I left off a caption because this was hard to put in a few words and maybe because this might have been a reach.
George’s explanation for his photograph only reveals the workings of his conscious mind. Freudian analysis suggests much deeper subconscious influences in George’s choice of image. The cross on the pavement may be a metaphorical grave marker representing the death of common sense. Alternatively, the image may represent a stick figure with the head severed from the body, representing the disconnect of the political leadership from the body of the community. Of course, an accurate understanding of George’s image selection may require many hours of psychiatric examination. Perhaps other readers can provide a more illuminating analysis. 🙂
I was wondering that myself. Why use a picture of a cross with a crack in it? Does that have some meaning for this story? I read the story and couldn’t find any reason why that picture was used.
lol Well, some of us see a big picture and some of us start and end with a photo.
Now that we have read your comments about the picture, what do you think of the commentary content?