ELECTORAL AREA A: Candidates answer our three questions

ELECTORAL AREA A: Candidates answer our three questions

ELECTORAL AREA A: Candidates answer our three questions

Decafnation asked this year’s candidates for public office to respond to three questions. We are publishing their responses by the jurisdictions in which they are a candidate.

Electoral Area A

One representative to be elected

2022 Candidates

Incumbent –Daniel Arbour

Challengers — Tamara Meggitt, Gordon Kennedy

1. In the event that a new dangerous variant of the COVID virus emerges or if a new pandemic arises would you use your position as a civic leader to support federal and provincial public health orders and encourage others to do likewise?

Daniel Arbour, incumbent

Making decisions through the COVID-19 pandemic was an unnerving experience. In March 2020, I was a Board Executive on the Vancouver Island Library with 39 branches, and had just been elected Chair of the Comox Valley Recreation Commission, responsible for pools and arenas. It was a dark time to have to close all facilities and tell our staff to stay home. I hated it. At the time there were also fears our hospitals could soon be overwhelmed.

With a Master’s in Environmental Studies and trained in scientific methodology, I have respect and trust in the medical profession and scientific fields. Professionals act on best available information; hypotheses are tested, and consensus is established. As a policy-maker job #1 was to limit the risks of mass death. We saw different jurisdictions try different policies. I never expected the response to be perfect, and there were some policy inconsistencies that could have been addressed. If another pandemic occurs, I would follow, support, and promote Provincial health guidance, while not vilifying alternative viewpoints or constructive criticisms of policies. Something snapped in our society with the pandemic, and we have important work to do to bring ourselves back together. I am hopeful we will.

Tamara Meggitt
As we have seen, Covid is one of many divisive issues society has been facing over the last few years. It is important to understand that when it comes to public health orders, they are provincial regulations and not municipal. As in all things, I will encourage people to act in ways that are in the best interests of all residents and to be respectful of each person’s views. Everyone has the right to feel safe. We need to end the divisiveness and have conversations to find solutions that work for everyone in a manner that is respectful.

Gordon Kennedy
We need to follow the scientists and their recommendations. That being said we can not force people to take vaccinations. ( I am fully vaccinated) I have my first Vaccination passport from 1960 issued by the Toronto School Board so I could go to school. I also have a second one from 1966 that was required to travel oversees (Canadian Government Document). These are not new ideas. I hope our scientists act with the most up to date information and that they give us the best advice. We have to work together to protect everyone.

2. Do you support the Regional Growth Strategy as it’s currently written? In particular, do you support its theme to funnel new growth into already defined urban boundaries, leaving the rural areas as rural as possible. And, do you support not adding any settlement nodes until the Union Bay Estates and K’omoks First Nations developments in the Union Bay area are well underway?

Daniel Arbour
The Comox Valley Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) is the foundational document which guides land use planning and development across the Comox Valley, and was developed following extensive public input and expert advice. The Official Community Plans of each community are aligned and nested within the RGS. The CVRD Board has started a review process which will straddle into the next term and will allow the community to consider if any amendments are required for the Comox Valley as a whole.

My view is that the current RGS follows best practice to avoid urban sprawl as we see in places like Nanaimo; protects forestry and forest lands; agriculture, and aquaculture for the benefit of future generations. The RGS allows for some growth outside the municipalities in three settlement nodes, namely Union Bay, Saratoga, and Mount Washington. As I am very familiar with the challenges of supporting the growth of the Union Bay settlement node, I definitely agree that no other areas should be considered for development outside the municipalities until we can demonstrate that existing settlement nodes can be developed sustainably. Lastly, as K’omoks First Nation approaches Treaty, I look forward to their suggestions regarding the RGS..

Tamara Meggitt
When we look at Area A, it has a population of 7,925 residents. There are 3,645 residents over the age of 60. That is almost 50%. Most are living in private households. Income stats suggest that many are living on pensions. The median income is a mere $33,000 annually. Having services closer such as medical practitioners, grocery stores, etc will go a long way in supporting them. In short, as we look at growth (Area A having the largest overall growth from 2016-2021 at 9.9%), we can also look at allowing homeowners to have suites, making owning a home more affordable and potentially opening options for families to remain together, keeping seniors at home and aiding in the housing crisis.

Gordon Kennedy
Officials should support the plan, however all plans should be evergreen. Meaning things change and we need to be flexible. I like the European rules of keeping rural land rural. We can grow the area within the urban areas we have zoned now (with more density). Restricting growth to these 2 areas you have mentioned may not be in the best interests of the valley. I have watched Union Bay have very little progress over the last four years. During two of those years I bought my property and built my house.

3. Do you believe it is the responsibility of local governments to take climate change focused actions and to consider how to minimize carbon emissions from municipal operations and facilities in all of the council deliberations?

Daniel Arbour
I believe it is the responsibility of all governments, businesses, and households to take strong climate action, as after decades of talk we have not managed to bend the curve on emissions. The CVRD Board recently passed a plan to reduce our organization’s greenhouse gas emissions by 50% by 2030. It will require discipline, hard choices, and resolve to achieve this target, and I believe we can.

A big emissions reduction opportunity I see is with BC Transit, which has committed to 100% electrification by 2040. This summer, BC Transit approached the CVRD to build an electric charging facility in the Valley, in anticipation of diesel bus replacements with an electric fleet. Federal grants of up to 80% funding are available. Once re-elected, I will propose that we approach School District 71 to partner on this initiative along with BC Transit and BC Hydro, with the goal of reducing facilities costs for all. This is one example, but there are many other climate actions the CVRD takes at almost every meeting. My record shows that I have been amongst the most vocal and pragmatic climate action champions at the CVRD board table.

Tamara Meggitt
I believe it is up to all of us to do what we can when it comes to taking actions that are environmentally sound. Imposed regulations must be realistic (phasing out of gas stations is not a realistic solution at this time). Some things we can do: make the ability to recycle easier for rural residents, support and encourage local initiatives to support our many artisans, crafters as well as our farmers.

Food security is a real concern for many residents. Producing locally can minimize our carbon footprint by reducing the need to ship products from foreign countries. I, along with a few friends, started a Facebook page (Shop Local Comox Valley) which now has 7,500 people on it. This was a concept that took off during Covid and has been steadily growing. As a municipal government, we can be working alongside residents to enhance access to everyday services that we all need.

Gordon Kennedy
Yes, you cannot fool mother nature. She will not negotiate. She will take us out. Every human being should take whatever actions they can. We all need to help in government or outside government. I believe in being a practical green. I recently built a house for less than $150 a square foot with solar panels and a heat pump. My last electric bill for two months was under $13 for a 4,000 square foot house. My best 12-month period was under $350 for a year.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WHERE AND WHEN TO VOTE

General Voting Day is Saturday, Oct. 15 for all local government positions.

Comox Valley Regional District

General Voting Day and advance voting take place at the CVRD building in Courtenay from 8 am to 8 pm.

Go to this link for General Voting Day locations in the three Electoral Areas.

Additional voting takes place on Oct. 6 from 9 am to 12 pm on Denman Island and on Oct. 6 from 2 pm to 5 pm on Hornby Island

Courtenay

Advance Voting begins on Wednesday October 5, 2022, 8 am to 8 pm at the Native Sons Hall, and again on Wednesday October 12, 2022, 8 am to 8 pm at the Florence Filberg Centre.

General Voting Day, Saturday, October 15, 2022, 8 am to 8 pm at the Queneesh Elementary School, and at the Florence Filberg Centre.

Comox

Advance voting begins Wednesday, October 5 from 8 a.m. – 8 p.m. at the Comox Community Centre, and on Saturday, October 8 from 10 a.m. – 2 p.m. at the Genoa Sail Building at Comox Marina, and again on Monday, October 10 from 10 a.m. – 2 p.m. at the Genoa Sail Building at Comox Marina, and on Wednesday, October 12 from 8 a.m. – 8 p.m. at the Comox Community Centre.

General Voting Day runs from 8 am to 8 pm on Oct. 15 at the Comox Community Centre.

Cumberland

All voting in the Village of Cumberland takes place from 8 am to 8 pm at the Cumberland Cultural Centre. Advance voting takes place on Oct. 5 and Oct. 12.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Enter your email address to subscribe to the Decafnation newsletter.

More

Here’s the latest Comox Valley local government election results

Mayor Bob Wells and all Courtenay incumbent councillors have been re-elected. Evan Jolicoeur has also been elected. Manno Theos has lost his seat.

Jonathan Kerr, Jenn Meilleur, Steve Blacklock, Chris Haslett, Ken Grant and Maureen Swift have been elected in Comox.

Vickey Brown has been elected mayor in Cumberland, defeating long-time mayor and councillor Leslie Baird.

Voting down -20.6% in Courtenay, -22.3% in Comox and -50.9% in Cumberland.

Full results with Electoral Areas A, B and C, school board and Islands Trust results in the morning.

Daniel Arbour in Area A and Edwin Grieve in Area C won by wide margins. Richard Hardy defeated Arzeena Hamir by 23 votes.

Shannon Aldinger topped the polls in races for SD71 school trustees.

Click the headline on this page for complete results and voter turnout.

Our recommendations in the 2022 Comox Valley local government elections

Decafnation announces its list of preferred candidates in this year’s local government elections and for the first time we identify candidates that we think show promise and provide our reasons for not endorsing the other candidates. Our endorsements fall on the first day of voting at advance polls

Daniel Arbour: Focused on rural planning, making Union Bay area a cohesive community

Daniel Arbour: Focused on rural planning, making Union Bay area a cohesive community

Area A incumbent Daniel Arbour at the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, where he is now Chair of the Municipal Infrastructure and Transportation committee

Daniel Arbour: Focused on rural planning, making Union Bay area a cohesive community

By

Daniel Arbour is seeking a second term representing Electoral Area A on the Comox Valley Regional District board. He has a Master’s degree in Environment & Sustainability. In 2020, he completed a certificate in Public Policy Analysis at the London School of Economics.

In 2022, he was re-elected to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities board and recently appointed as the national Chair of the Municipal Infrastructure and Transportation committee. He has served as the Economic Development Officer with the Hornby Island Community Economic Enhancement Corporation and previously as General Manager of the Hornby Festival and worked for Ecotrust Canada.

He moved to the Comox Valley in 2002 and currently sits on the Vancouver Island Public Library executive, on the Island Corridor Foundation board and Chairs the Comox Valley Recreation Commission.

 

Why should voters re-elect you?

Arbour expects Electoral Area A to continue being the busiest of the three rural areas during the next four years and would benefit from his experienced leadership.

“We have, for example, incorporated the Union Bay Improvement District into the CVRD, devoted hours to planning for the coming growth of the area, gone through COVID and still supported many organizations and groups, expanded bus services, received major grants for fibre optic service on the islands and the Denman water treatment plant. And I hope we will have success with sewage grants as well,” he told Decafnation.

Arbour says that 95 percent of his focus in Area A has been on core municipal services and that “I’ve been at it full time.”

He was just appointed chair of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities Municipal infrastructure and Transportation committee where he will be advocating for programs that support local government across Canada.

“I have high expectations for myself,” he said. “And I believe I have performed well. I think I have been an effective representative for Area A these four years.”

Arbour thinks that he represents the views of the vast majority of people in Area A and that he has served them well.

“I would be happy if all the incumbents were returned, including Edwin (Grieve in Area C) and Arzeena (Hamir in Area B).

 

What are some of your key accomplishments?

Arbour sees Area A as five distinct communities: Royston, Union Bay, Fanny Bay, Hornby and Denman, and each has its own unique needs and opportunities

“On the Islands, we brought fibre optic cable that is being installed right now, thanks to a $7.8 grant I helped secure from the province,” he said.

The islands have tried for more than a decade to get a better-wired connection, so when residents were asked in a recent referendum if they wanted it, 93 per cent said yes. Residents will pay 10 percent of the cost.

“The best part is the municipal-owned telecom laying the fibre cable (city of Prince Rupert) will return 20 percent of the profits to the islands for at least 20 years. That money will go to funding nonprofits on both islands,” he said.

During his first term, Arbour also brought bus service to the islands, which he expects to grow over time. Island residents have for years paid $150,000 to $200,000 to the regional district as a contribution to public transit in the Comox Valley, But they had no service.

“Now, roughly half of that money will fund the islands’ own bus service,” he said.

On the Vancouver Island portion of Area A – essentially Fanny Bay, Union Bay and Royston – Arbour has brought in a historical partnership with K’omoks First Nation and Union Bay Estates that opens the door to a sewage conveyance system for the Baynes Sound area. He perceives both the KFN and UB Estates properties as future municipalities just now in the incubation stage.

The province and federal government are in the process of finalizing a treaty package that will turn over a large piece of crown land in the Union Bay area to KFN. Between the new KFN land and UB Estates, there is the long-term potential for a proper small town to emerge around Union Bay.

The area is one of the settlement nodes identified in the Comox Valley Regional Growth Strategy for future growth.

“Our work right now is to ensure adequate infrastructure is in place, and to start looking at integrated planning,” he said.

For Royston, Arbour says he will focus on moving the burgeoning community’s drinking water from sharing Cumberland’s water source to the wider Comox Valley source at Comox Lake.

“With Cumberland’s growth, we were notified a number of years ago that they would stop serving the Royston community, so it will be an important capital project to connect their system to Comox Lake water, which eventually will also service the K’omoks First Nation lands as part of our reconciliation efforts,” he said.

He will also focus on bringing a sewerage system to the area. The new CVRD Liquid Waste Management Plan will include a $50 million Big Pipe proposal to connect the Baynes Sound area to the existing Courtenay-Comox sewerage system. This month, residents from Union Bay and Royston will join the plan’s existing Public Advisory Committee to provide feedback on sewage planning for Union Bay and Royston.

“This is very exciting to see, but we will also have to watch for affordability. Major grants have been applied for the project which hopefully will come through,” he said.

For all sections of Area A, Arbour says he’s dedicated to working with nonprofits and helping them find the money for projects that improve their quality of life.

“For example, we funneled regional money during COVID to build a playground at the Fanny Bay Hall, which kept families safely close to home. And along with Area B and Area C, we revamped the rural grants program, creating annual and multi-year funding streams for nonprofits,” he said.

 

Goals for the next four years

Arbour says rural planning will be his top priority over the next four years.

“Once the critical infrastructure is in place for Royston and Union Bay, we will need to do integrated planning so that we have a sustainable and livable community,” he said. “Questions that may come up include how to connect KFN’s development with Union Bay and Royston so there is walkability and livability and so the whole area feels like a well-planned cohesive community rather than a patchwork.”

One of the challenges is that KFN will be self-governing, so they won’t need to necessarily consult with the regional district.

“That means that maintaining and building the relationships will be important to support good planning and benefits for everyone,” he said.

Arbour’s focus on the CVRD board is to amp up climate-focused action in everything they do. The regional district has initiated an electrification policy for replacing fleet vehicles with electric ones where it makes operational sense. And they have already put 10 charging stations at the new CVRD building anticipating this change.

He says a review and rewrite of the Official Community Plan for the three electoral areas will take place in year three or four of the next term. Before that, the CVRD will lead a community review of the RGS.

“Most, or a majority of regional incumbents are happy with the existing document, although many of the goals haven’t yet been fully achieved,” he said.

And he is supporting BC Transit’s proposal to build a charging facility for its future electric bus fleet that will be completed by 2040. This will cost $20 million or more, but 80 percent of that would be covered by federal grants.

Another of Arbour’s goals is to reduce methane emissions from the landfill site. There is a new Solid Waste Management Commission plan to achieve this goal, partly by moving all food waste to a new organic composting facility now under construction.

“I wanted the CVRD to commit to lowering its greenhouse gas emissions by 70 percent by 2030 and the board settled on a 50 percent target,” he said. “I believe people now expect climate action from local government. Every new staff report addresses climate change concerns and I am very supportive of this.”

In the long term, Arbour has a dream to bring Vancouver Island regional districts and First Nations together to purchase all of the Island’s private forest lands, in partnership with the province.

“It makes sense and is imperative for the public to own its watersheds,” he said. “The current and future pressures on our water supplies require better management of our watersheds than a private company focused on logging can provide.”

He says Crown-owned forest lands are better managed for sustainable forestry and protection of water, and the same standards should apply to large private forestlands.

“Publicly owned forest lands is not a new thing, there’s lots of precedent in BC,” he said. “There are currently 60 community-owned forests in the province, such as Squamish, Whistler and Capilano, and it seems to me that we would do a much better job managing for multiple values if the forests were publicly owned.”

Arbour also plans to put a special focus on BC Ferry issues and shift the service more toward users’ needs.

“The goal is to create a smooth experience to move on and off the islands,” he said. “I would like to see at least the service for small islands to be moved out of the BC Ferry Corporation and back into the Ministry of Highways.”

Arbour was so fed up that he resigned from the BC Ferries Advisory Committee a while ago, but says he plans to join again. The province currently subsidizes 60 percent of small-run ferry services and users pay 40 percent. On the big runs across the Strait of Georgia, users pay over 90 percent.

“But in the interior, the Kootenay ferries across rivers and lakes are 100 percent subsidized by the province,” he said. “These discrepancies and some other bad choices by BCF have upset islanders who think the system doesn’t focus on users. The Denman cable ferry, for example, has no backup plan if it goes out of service.”

 

The most misunderstood thing about the CVRD

Arbour thinks that most people don’t know or fully understand the regional district.

“Think of it this way: The CVRD is a federation like Canada. The municipalities are the provinces. Umbrella issues that stretch across the provinces, like health care, are managed by the federation. It’s the same for issues common to the region’s municipalities. The rural electoral areas are like Canada’s territories, which have limited power and are treated differently than the municipalities,” he said.

He would also like people to understand that every tax dollar collected from rural residents is applied to each service those residents participate in.

“The money doesn’t get gobbled up by the municipalities. All services are in a box and the money stays there. It’s very transparent. No money disappears. There is no slush fund,” he said.

After four years of hearing complaints, Arbour has found that if people don’t understand the structure and trust the financing, then that colors their perception of the CVRD.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WHERE AND WHEN TO VOTE

General Voting Day is Saturday, Oct. 15 for all local government positions.

Comox Valley Regional District

General Voting Day and advance voting take place at the CVRD building in Courtenay from 8 am to 8 pm.

Go to this link for General Voting Day locations in the three Electoral Areas.

Additional voting takes place on Oct. 6 from 9 am to 12 pm on Denman Island and on Oct. 6 from 2 pm to 5 pm on Hornby Island

Courtenay

Advance Voting begins on Wednesday October 5, 2022, 8 am to 8 pm at the Native Sons Hall, and again on Wednesday October 12, 2022, 8 am to 8 pm at the Florence Filberg Centre.

General Voting Day, Saturday, October 15, 2022, 8 am to 8 pm at the Queneesh Elementary School, and at the Florence Filberg Centre.

Comox

Advance voting begins Wednesday, October 5 from 8 a.m. – 8 p.m. at the Comox Community Centre, and on Saturday, October 8 from 10 a.m. – 2 p.m. at the Genoa Sail Building at Comox Marina, and again on Monday, October 10 from 10 a.m. – 2 p.m. at the Genoa Sail Building at Comox Marina, and on Wednesday, October 12 from 8 a.m. – 8 p.m. at the Comox Community Centre.

General Voting Day runs from 8 am to 8 pm on Oct. 15 at the Comox Community Centre.

Cumberland

All voting in the Village of Cumberland takes place from 8 am to 8 pm at the Cumberland Cultural Centre. Advance voting takes place on Oct. 5 and Oct. 12.

 

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Enter your email address to subscribe to the Decafnation newsletter.

More

Here’s the latest Comox Valley local government election results

Mayor Bob Wells and all Courtenay incumbent councillors have been re-elected. Evan Jolicoeur has also been elected. Manno Theos has lost his seat.

Jonathan Kerr, Jenn Meilleur, Steve Blacklock, Chris Haslett, Ken Grant and Maureen Swift have been elected in Comox.

Vickey Brown has been elected mayor in Cumberland, defeating long-time mayor and councillor Leslie Baird.

Voting down -20.6% in Courtenay, -22.3% in Comox and -50.9% in Cumberland.

Full results with Electoral Areas A, B and C, school board and Islands Trust results in the morning.

Daniel Arbour in Area A and Edwin Grieve in Area C won by wide margins. Richard Hardy defeated Arzeena Hamir by 23 votes.

Shannon Aldinger topped the polls in races for SD71 school trustees.

Click the headline on this page for complete results and voter turnout.

Our recommendations in the 2022 Comox Valley local government elections

Decafnation announces its list of preferred candidates in this year’s local government elections and for the first time we identify candidates that we think show promise and provide our reasons for not endorsing the other candidates. Our endorsements fall on the first day of voting at advance polls

Electoral Area A Comments

These are the written comments made by Electoral Area A residents who participated in Decafnation’s Local Government Performance Review. Comments that breached our journalistic standards have been eliminated. All other comments appear as entered into the online survey platform. Click on each image to enlarge the view.

Daniel Arbour

 He seems committed to the work and is a very good speaker.

Admirable!

 He has a good media presence so I see things he is trying to do. Shares information on Facebook. Connects with locals about rural concerns and get what’s it’s like to live rurally.

 Has done a good job of reaching out to residents

 I respect his stand with BCF although it did not really get us anywhere.

 Daniel has made an effort to reach out and provide support and advocacy for a number of Denman Island community projects.

 He’s accessible and sympathetic – this is great for us.

 High profile, gets on with it. He is most approachable. Is sincere in what he says.

 Seems smart and very involved which is great.

 Although a Hornby Islander, Daniel Arbour is doing a good job of representing both the “Big Island” and “Little Islands” parts of Area A.

 hard-working, clear communicator, approachable, makes things happen, engaged, ethical

 Takes the area concerns seriously and is very good with keeping us informed.

 He has done an exceptional job of keeping the community informed and obtaining feedback.

 Good one you for speaking up! even when it makes them uncomfortable. Be the politician that speaks truth.

 Who? Where is his media presence letting the public know how things are.

 This guy is great! One of our very best area directors

 Daniel reaches out to the community much more than our previous director. He works to keep us informed.

 He’s good at communicating.

Any emails or short Meet Your Area Rep has always gone well. Daniel Arbour is a hard worker and wants to do his best.

 Very approachable, helpful, accessible and informative.

 Hard working director.

 I appreciate that Daniel uses Facebook to communicate with constituents.

 He has failed Union Bay with his Developer friendly attitude. The Developer is screwing with people’s lives.

Area A Comments on CVRD

Not familiar with enough of the issues to assess their work.

Not sure what they are responsible for, what they do.

Suggestion that the financial reports of tax funded committees on Denman Island should be more readily accessible to the residents. Thanks for the new stairs at Denman West, and other work on trails.

Other than Daniel A. , I’ve not yet had any dealings with any of them.

We Denman and Hornby Islanders used to have our own Regional District Area but have since been rolled back into Area A. Luckily Area A elected a Hornby Islander, Daniel Arbour.

Haven’t followed closely enough to offer a judgement.

Unsure of their performance, except Daniel Arbour is the only one I’ve followed, and he has a good lick of practicality and seems quite “real” about whats going on. Appreciate his efforts and hope he keeps speaking truth to power.

Have not heard anything from any one in the district during Covid.

Too much favourism among the Directors

They seem to be doing an okay job.

We have one person looking after CVRD A which encompasses a large area with a diverse population. I hope most of the residents are reasonable people and approach their elected official respectfully. I know some things take long to progress but we also need to remember it’s different levels of government who may have more power in doing things.

We’ll see as time goes on, Union Bay is in transition.

So far so good, from what I’ve been able to glean from Decafnation and Daniel’s Facebook page.

What do they do for Union Bay?

Area A Issues

⇒ Taxes on the Valley’s highest emitters could be redirected to support local decarbonization strategies. Anyone in the Valley driving an F350, towing a boat, and driving quads and Skidoos should pay steel registration fees. The collected revenue put into active transport infrastructure etc.

⇒ The Comox Valley is doing a great job at pushing the hard-working people in low-income jobs out. If you don’t deal with the disgusting rent and housing costs you will have no service people left.

⇒ Internet access: high speed (>25 Mbs), equally accessible and affordable.

⇒ Just get stuff done in a timely manner.

⇒ Never mind relations with first nations. And low-income housing ?? What spend the money and time on infrastructure that benefits the island. And make the complaint system disappear, please. Turning people against each other. Clean up the trailer, buses and shacks. Islands trust doesn’t fund low-income housing. The low-income housing application have both been on lands that have a better use. Alr and forestry. Application NEEDS to be on residential lands.

⇒ Please pay attention to the upcoming census as Denman is changing rapidly and this will reflect in needs of the Islanders.

⇒ Consistent application of bylaws to ensure the quality of life for all.

⇒ COVID recovery and response

⇒ Thanks for making this available. Thanks for asking.

⇒ Affordable housing is by far the biggest issue on Denman Island, especially since the ITC has decided to impose a crackdown on non-conforming dwellings that have existed here for nearly 50 years. The Regional District has jurisdiction over building permits, inspections, etc, but delegate this to the LTC even though the Island is not a municipality (which are customarily delegated such jurisdiction). The problem is, the LTC does not provide building inspection (the province provides septic and electrical inspection only) —I suppose as a sop to residents who objected to the imposition of the Islands Trust in 1974; as a result, non-conforming dwellings (and a large proportion of conforming ones) are substandard, potentially unhealthy and unsafe despite the BC Building Code being in effect on every square inch of the province. However, we need to house workers employed at the various businesses here or who provide many services our generally geriatric population needs. This issue is becoming extremely contentious as the new bylaw enforcement officer has been handing out eviction notices with zeal unlike we’ve ever seen before. The new Bylaw Enforcement Notification system is an attempt to insulate the IT from court costs —that is, it deprives —or claims to, at least—residents’ of their day in court to settle bylaw disputes (the BEN system apparently substitutes for a number of failed attempts to implement a municipal-style ticketing system which, because the ITC is not responsible to is electors, is unconstitutional—beyond the IT’s jurisdiction in the same way the IT may not levy taxes, requiring the CVRD to do it in its stead as per the English Bill of Rights 1688/89, its derivatives in Common Law enshrined in the British North America Act 1867 and, now, the Constitution Act 1982). Many residents feel the BEN system is unfair and imprudent, if not unconstitutional. Naturally, the IT is precisely that: a trusteeship like any other, meaning its Trustees represent the special mandate of Islands Trust Act to residents—residents are not represented to the IT. In other words, our two elected Trustees (the ITC chair is a Trustee elected by residents of Bowen Island) are responsible to the narrow mandate of the IT Act only, not to their electors. Thus, because the LTC has sole authority over land-use zoning, we Islanders have few democratic tools to solve the severe housing shortage here—even though, ironically, we have four jurisdictions to which we elect officials whereas most BC citizens have only two or three. This mounting problem is not the fault of any elected representatives but, rather, of conflict between the IT mandate and residents who also elect representatives to responsible governments which cannot respond to their electors because of the restrictive IT mandate. It is a systems problem that has been assiduously ignored since 1974–which is why non-conforming dwellings are so common here, a sort of detente because almost everybody either knows someone who lives in such a dwelling, lives in one themselves, or provides such for someone: if anybody makes an official (anonymous) complaint, it risks a storm of tit-for-tat retaliation, suspicion and unneighbourliness that would affect nearly everyone here. Apparently, the IT Council (which is not elected by residents) is willing to take that risk—at the expense of humanity, peace, happiness, neighbourliness and prosperity on our Island. The position of Islands Trustee on Denman Island (and, presumably, on other Islands in Trust too) is therefore fraught with difficulty and, often, rancour. That’s why many residents here vote for and are thankful to have an energetic Trustee in Laura Busheikin who works tirelessly with the utmost integrity to find compromises within this strange, restrictive kind of jurisdictional conundrum that is not responding to an urgent problem: the lack of affordable housing. This could be solved if secondary dwellings were generally permitted on all properties (save ALR, about 50% of our Island, which has its own restrictions in this regard that trump the IT)—a possibility only Trustee Busheikin has shown any interest in. This issue is getting very, very hot here. It hasn’t been a healthy situation for a long time but looks to get even less so if something isn’t done soon about how we residents are represented to responsible governments. We already have affordable housing, such as it is, we just need it to be legal, healthy and safe.

⇒ Climate change, sustainable economics, and affordable housing are at the top of my political agenda, but I don’t think local and regional representatives have the power to deal meaningfully with them. They all urgently require fast, decisive provincial, national, and international action.

⇒ Provide the needs of the citizens at a reasonable cost. Don’t waste money on pet projects. Unless infrastructure is addressed, that includes ferries and bridges, we do not need more growth.

⇒ Policing in rural areas

⇒ People are suffering, it is getting worse, and those of us who are trying to help by housing (illegally) those who lack housing are now being targeted by bylaw enforcement. We will have a tent city in no time if something doesn’t happen now.

⇒ Fix the problems. We need to repave roads, more help for mental health persons, we need to keep our green spaces and stick to the growth plan. Stop big developers from tearing down and destroying green space. Upgrade the run-down areas and increase density in pockets rather than urban sprawl that only helps the realtors and developers.

⇒ All of the above. I would like to see some more concrete action with the people who seem to need to heat their homes with wet wood. Dry wood is still bad for everyone regardless. The burning in the back yards is awful and spreads the smoke all over the neighbourhood. I know there is a committee/forum on it and incentives to switch to alternatives. Tougher laws are needed. Help those of us who have difficulty breathing and everyone else whose health is impacted whether they know it or not.

⇒ What about COVID?

⇒ Oh man, I wanted to tick everything. The global climate crisis is having a knock-on effect on so many other variables … We really need to be thoughtful about our growth strategy. The Weekender Effect has taken hold and it’s a crying shame. I keep saying that the barometer I use is how “dog friendly” our communities are. Can’t believe someone asked me to leash my dog when we were walking up Forbidden the other week – man oh man, it wasn’t so long ago that you could go up Becher with your pack of dogs, and not see a single other party on the trail. We have to be very mindful of the culture we develop as Vancouver moves in.

Islands Trust Comments

These are the written comments made about the four Islands Trust representative by Electoral Area A respondents who participated in Decafnation’s Local Government Performance Review. Comments that breached our journalistic standards have been eliminated. All other comments appear as entered into the online survey platform. Click on each image to enlarge the view.

David Critchley — Denman

⇒ Don’t know his work.

⇒ Does not adequately connect with all sectors of Denman’s community.

⇒ Only 2nd time I’ve heard his name. 1st time, he apparently did not know there is a shortage of affordable housing on Denman. Really dude, open your eyes!! Be in touch with the people who live in the area you represent.

⇒ Has has had to take a lot of complaints on the Denman Green which is undeserved. David cares about the community and listens to all points of view prior to making a decision.

⇒ My general sense about the Islands’ Trust is that it’s getting progressively more expensive, for progressively fewer benefits. Despite all the cost increases, Denman’s population keeps growing, and the environment gets further and further away from a “natural” one. My suggestion would be that our LTC’s mandate should be limited to land use applications only, and any surplus funds directed to health care.

⇒ Taxes for the Trust are almost as big as for the hospital. What does the Trust do except hold complicated meetings?

⇒ David seems to stand up for what is right in preserving the beauty and fabric of the Denman community.

⇒ Trustee Critchley is a lawyer and performs his LTC job officiously. He tends to take a conservative position on certain issues, particularly housing which has become a hot-button again as the IT Council has decided to crack down on non-conforming dwellings and has been issuing eviction notices since last winter. These “illegal” dwellings have existed on this Island for 47 years—ever since the imposition of the Islands Trust. They exist because they are critically necessary: the AVERAGE age on Denman is 61 years old and younger workers of every sort are needed—and need places to live. Trustee Critchley has tended to support the recent crackdown on non-conforming dwellings. About 20% of our population lives in these.

Works hard, ethical, great work on marine issues

⇒ David is extremely out of touch with the community. His current actions are an embarrassment to humanity in regards to acknowledging that a housing crisis exists.

⇒ Critchley is choosing to ignore/dismiss a housing crisis happening under his nose, in spite of it being brought to his attention on numerous occasions. He does not engage with his community, not does he speak up on serious issues that impact people.

⇒ This trustee is out of touch. He says he doesn’t know anything about the current housing crisis on Denman (it has been a long time coming but recent Bylaw enforcement has forced evictions on Denman Island). He attends meetings and committees and as far as I can tell that is all he does. He neither communicates regularly with the community. Nor is he approachable. Nor does he listen to feedback from his constituents. Time to retire Mr. Critchley.

⇒ I’m not sure if I’m dissatisfied with the performance, or more lack of performance. I have gone to him 3 times about checking on a possible by-law infraction, asking for clarification on it and he’s not offering guidance. He says there is no way to find out about permits until after they’re approved. We both said that wasn’t satisfactory, but he didn’t offer to put forward a way to change that.

Alex Allen — Hornby

He is a good communicator and raises issues which are pertinent to life on the island.

Not sure what he has done for us. First time I’ve seen his name. Don’t live on Hornby.

Grant Scott — Hornby

He’s learning the ropes and is committed to making the Trust more accessible.

Not sure what he has done for us. First time I’ve seen his name. Don’t live on Hornby.

Seems disengaged

Laura Busheikin — Denman

⇒ She’s a very clear speaker and well organized, but I don’t follow Denman issues.

⇒ Admirable!

⇒ I know Laura brings up concerns and issues that need to be addressed. I.E. low-income housing. She is well-spoken and kind.

⇒ She doesn’t really answer your questions. I find the local gov. It making it difficult for landowners. They have never made bylaws for the farm plan.

⇒ At times has spent too much time on First Nations issues instead of local day to day infrastructure concerns. Otherwise, Laura is a wonderful, considerate, intelligent representative for our community.

⇒ Don’t live on the island

⇒ Laura is very responsive to community needs.

⇒ My general sense about the Islands’ Trust is that it’s getting progressively more expensive, for progressively fewer benefits. Despite all the cost increases, Denman’s population keeps growing, and the environment gets further and further away from a “natural” one. My suggestion would be that our LTC’s mandate should be limited to land use applications only, and any surplus funds directed to health care.

⇒ The Trust has outlived its mandate. They make projects up to look busy.

⇒ Laura responds and acts upon demands and requests from a very small select group of total idiots on Denman’s Facebook group! Laura’s reading and interacting with these Facebook posts is extremely dangerous, as I truly believe they do NOT represent the views of the silent and vast majority of people on Denman at all! She should remain distanced and non-commital to these people and simply take their views into account in the overall scheme of things. For example, she should NOT be promoting lowering the standard of bylaw enforcement to support this small group of people who would love to see Denman become a slum of trailers, shipping containers and live in vehicles. She should not suggest, for example, that seacans would be a great solution to the housing shortage. If people are not able to afford living on Denman for whatever reason, then they should seek housing elsewhere in the much larger world out there where there are much larger taxpayer-funded programs to assist such people. I do not believe the argument that homeless type people are needed to staff the businesses on Denman is a good one. With some exceptions, for the most part, businesses are staffed by the owners or young people living with their families on the island. There is no need to promote homeless type people moving here to staff the businesses. These people are not the main workers here. They come to Denman because it has a reputation for low-cost living and lax rules. Then they expect to be handed a place to live for practically nothing and to live off of this very generous community’s handouts.

⇒ Laura is by far the best Islands Trustee we’ve had in the 31 years I’ve lived on Denman Island. She’s smart, hard-working, and faultlessly ethical despite being cast, in some Islanders’ minds, as a foil to Local Trust Committee members whom they regard as “elitists.” I’m sure she wouldn’t agree with that characterization, but it relates to her tireless, decade-long effort, before she was elected Trustee, to realize a creative housing solution, the “Coho Landing” co-housing development (fifteen households sharing a number of amenities to reduce environmental footprint and offering affordable opportunities whenever old members move on and new ones are lucky enough to fill their spot; all required special land-use zoning). Laura spearheaded this community project and, probably for this reason, many voters expect her to represent their concerns about the chronically severe lack of affordable housing on our Island. She works well with her LTC colleagues and within the rules, nevertheless. Very professional—and a very nice person, too!

⇒ Laura B is the hardest working, clearest communicating, most democratic process-oriented I’ve experienced in 35 years of full-time residence on Denman.

Very engaged, great communicator, patient, fair-minded, ethical

⇒ Laura is extremely intelligent and very aware of what is happening on her island, has articulated truth in LTC meetings, and regularly engages with her community

⇒ One of our very best trustees. An excellent elected official