Low-lying fog on the Puntledge River seen from the popular Bevan Swing swimming area | George Le Masurier photo
The Week: Does the Comox Valley need a regional park service … and quickly?
This week we’re talking about regional parks and zeroing in on what 3L Developments Inc. actually paid for their Puntledge Triangle land. We’re being curious about an interesting twist in the school trustee by-election on Saturday and a missed opportunity for the Town of Comox. And what happened to Ronna-Rae Leonard?
Meanwhile, it’s opening weekend up at Mt. Washington.
— Does the Comox Valley need a regional parks service? Given all the recent attention to popular recreation areas along both sides of the Puntledge River, it seems that we do. And it’s probably inevitable.
We reported this week on a new society that hopes to save the Bevan Trails area from imminent logging by Hancock Forest Management. There’s also a public interest in preserving the current state of the Puntledge Triangle and its access to Stotan Falls.
These two areas — both located in Electoral Area C — certainly warrant public acquisition. The Puntledge River runs through the heart of the Comox Valley and we already have several parks along the river’s lower reaches.
But here’s the problem: There is no Comox Valley regional park service. So it’s currently up to rural taxpayers to fund the purchase of any land for parks in Electoral Areas A, B or C. Because the three Comox Valley municipalities do not contribute to the rural parks fund, its funds are limited.
Other regional districts on the Island have regional park services. For example, consider this language from the Regional District of Nanaimo:
“A regional park function was established in the RDN in 1989. In 1995, the Regional Board adopted a Parks System Plan to guide the development of Regional Parks. The vision back then was of a park system that “secures, protects and stewards lands within the Region that maintain livability, provide environmental and natural resource protection and accommodate outdoor recreational pursuits”.
“Then, in 1998, the Board approved a plan for acquiring up to nine regional park sites over the next seven years. The sites were intended to serve a variety of outdoor activities, and protect a range of habitats and natural features.”
A regional park function makes sense for us, too. And we might already have one.
Area C Director Edwin Grieve believes the Comox Valley Regional District has an inactive regional park service bylaw. He told Decafnation this week that regional directors adopted a bylaw in the 1990s but it lapsed because they couldn’t decide which projects to fund. The bylaw could be re-activated because the regional board has never rescinded it.
Regional district staff plan to present a report on this topic at the board’s Dec. 15 meeting.
It’s fair to say that those people living in the densest and highest populated areas of our community are just as likely — some would argue more likely — to use parks and other recreational sites in our rural areas. Shouldn’t they contribute to the purchase and maintenance of regional parks?
Of course, this is going to spark a whole new community conversation. But it’s one we must have if we’re going to consider preserving large areas like the Puntledge Triangle or Bevan Trails.
Is it possible for local governments to make all of this happen in time to preserve either of the areas currently on the chopping block? Stay tuned.
— Speaking of 3L Developments Inc., In last week’s commentary, we speculated that the company had paid around $1.5 million for the four parcels comprising their proposed Riverwood subdivision. We were wrong.
According to new information from two separate sources, tax records show the company paid almost $3.7 million. The sales mostly occurred in 2006. One of the parcels shows a sale as late as 2012 but that could be the result of an internal transfer of titles, according to one source.
BC Assessment records show the properties were valued for tax purposes at $4.646 million in 2019 and at $4.222 million in 2020, a drop of $424,000.
— There’s an interesting twist to Dec. 12’s general voting in the Area C school trustee by-election.
When voters go to the polls on Saturday, Dec. 12 they might not recognize the name of one candidate: Cristi May.
Cristi May-Sacht is definitely among the six candidates seeking election. But not Cristi May.
According to our source, May-Sacht was told her name was too long to fit on the physical ballot so it was shortened. That’s a curious decision.
What happens if May-Sacht falls just a few votes short of winning? Could she demand a new election with her proper name on the ballot?
— The Town of Comox has missed an excellent opportunity to resolve their Mack Laing Trust problem; specifically, what to do with the famous ornithologist’s heritage home, called Shakesides.
The BC Government has set aside $90 million to provide fully-funded $1 million grants for local government projects that support economic resilience during the pandemic. The idea is to create immediate job opportunities for those negatively impacted by COVID public health orders. Eligible projects have to begin by the end of next year and complete within two years.
The government specified four key categories of shovel-ready projects that would qualify. One of those is Unique Heritage Infrastructure.
Restoring Shakesides in accordance with the Laing Trust agreement would have surely qualified. There’s already a comprehensive business plan for the project and more than 30 volunteer skilled craftspeople and businesses, including Lacasse Construction, are ready to go.
But the only application submitted by the town was to construct a new marine services building on the waterfront.
The town needs to deal with its failure to resolve this outstanding issue. Two years ago, the Town Council couldn’t get back to the BC Supreme Court fast enough for a ruling on their petition to vary the trust agreement and demolish Shakesides. Now they’re doing nothing.
Why? Probably because a few early Supreme Court orders went against them. A Justice ruled that the Mack Laing Heritage Society could participate in the court hearings and present their mountain of evidence, some of which looks very bad for the town.
So, after spending nearly $300,000 of your tax money on legal fees, the town realized there was a high probability the court would deny their application. The court could also order an independent financial audit of how the town handled the financial aspects of the Mack Laing Trust agreement.
No surprise then that the Town Council is avoiding a trip back to court.
That’s what makes this missed opportunity so sad. A $1 million grant from the province to fund a Shakesides restoration project along with the Heritage Society’s volunteers might have made this 38-year-old lingering problem go away. And it could have healed a few community wounds.
— Courtenay-Comox voters might have noticed an interesting change in Premier John Horgan’s new government. Absent from the list is MLA Ronna-Rae Leonard.
She lost her position as the government’s Parliamentary Secretary for Seniors’ Services and Long-Term Care to Mable Elmore, an 11-year MLA for Vancouver-Kensington. No reason was given for the change.
This article was updated to correct the general voting date to Saturday, Dec. 12.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
The Week: Give us full transparency when paid ‘volunteers’ work with CV students
Faith-based volunteers can contribute positively to the educational experience in our public schools but everyone must be perfectly clear about who they are, what they can and cannot do and school administrators must monitor their activity closely and consistently
What’s dire: the lack of Comox subdivisions or climate change and gradual deforestation?
A Comox Valley developer is suing the Town of Comox because his permits to cut down trees and build more single-family homes haven’t been issued as fast as he’s wanted and because the town wants a wider walking trail through the property
The Week: Ken Grant fined by Elections BC and Parksville confronted by development, water issues
Another Comox Councillor was fined by Elections BC for violating BC elections laws, plus Parksville’s water supply is unable to meet provincial requirements for summer water flow in the Englishman River let alone provide water for a proposed 800-unit development
THE WEEK: As Puntledge River goes lower, Colorado drinking recycled wastewater
A serious fall drought has reduced flows in the Puntledge River, shutting down hydroelectric power generation for the first time in 55 years. Meanwhile, many states eye sending treated wastewater to kitchen taps
THE WEEK: Let the people have a larger voice at Comox Valley council meetings
Making it easier for citizens to speak directly to municipal councils might increase public interest in local government, which in turn might encourage more registered voters to actually cast a ballot
The Week: Comox, Cumberland appointments pass, but no word on Courtenay … yet
Cumberland and Comox municipal councils approve their mayor’s annual appointments, but Courtenay was a no show at its inaugural meeting. Is there conflict behind the scenes?
The Week: Valley councils begin new terms, but will Comox ignore voters?
Dr. Jonathan Kerr topped the polls with voters, but will that resonate at the Comox Town Council as it is poised to approve new Mayor Nicole Minions’ appointments and assignments?
THE WEEK: Water supplies are good, fireworks are bad and where Daniel Arbour lives
Despite the long drought this summer, Comox Valley water system supplies have not been threatened; the BC Wildfire Service has banned fireworks this year and clarifying Daniel Arbour’s place of residence
Let’s put one of the craziest Comox Valley elections into the history book, and then close it
It was weird. But when the sun rose on Oct. 16, Comox Valley voters had made it clear they liked the direction charted by our local governments. In the municipalities, they elected all but two incumbents. In most races, the vote was a definite pat on the back for a job well done.
A few random items as the 2022 election comes to a close
Long-time public official Bronco Moncrief dies, Manno Theos hangs out in Greece, and Daniel Arbour reacts to lies about his campaign finances
The Regional District does a great job on Parks And Beach Access. They are very well funded and have no responsiblity for costly services that Courtenay , Comox, Cumberland taxpayers need to fund. Roads, sidewalks, storm water, snow clearing,Bridges ,street lights etc. .
So it would make sense that the CVRD manage Parklands beyond municipal boundaries. They have large reserve funds , thanks to income from fees for water, landfills and waste water treatment.
I am Thankfull, that years ago, there was a vision to preserve the Parkland that we enjoy today .Everywhere.CVRD. Courtenay, Comox. Cumberland.
Thank you, those before us, and those still working on preservation of Parkland.
Thanks for you research and reporting. I noted from a letter in today’s local paper that 3L has significantly changed their proposed development. I also heard this from Dave Mellin, who has been a significant contibuter to many fine community projects in the Comox valley. Thankfully we have those who are willing to step up and get things done for the rest of us, who usually stand by waiting for some one to do something.
So now I understand that 3L , is willing to change their proposal , significanly. I am not a fan of Any body who claims to own a river bed or a Governent that apparently granted that right, I have been through the process of ownership of public beach access property within the CVRD with my neighbours, and am pleased that the CVRD did the right thing with these public properties.
How is the 3L development any farther away from the core of Courtenay than settlement nodes in Union Bay or Saratoga Beach?
This 3L developer has been less than diplomatic in his approach, a bully,but it is time to think about the preservation of Parkland in this special place,
Linda — 3L Developments did revise their application to the Electoral Area Services Commission, but only after their original proposal had been reviewed and vetted by a number of other local governments, agencies and First Nations. It was presented too late to be considered. They should have presented that version first. All of this was reported on in our story of Nov. 16. https://decafnation.ca/2020/11/16/regional-district-again-rejects-3l-developments-amending-regional-growth-strategy/
Take the millions spent on CVEDS and put it into regional parks instead. Much more effect for the money and probably attract many more tourists.
The reason Ronna-Rae Leonard’s name is missing from the cabinet and parliamentary secretary list is because she doesn’t have what it takes to be there. She may have won the election, however there are a lot of people I know who did not vote for her this year or in the last election. She consistently toes the party line despite the fact that many of her constituents, me included, do not support LNG or Site C and have lobbied outside her office for months to get this project cancelled. She speaks for the party, not for the people of the Comox Valley.
Absolutely true. This woman does not deserve the position of MLA. Probably the least responsive, poorest informed MLA in BC. Ask anyone who has tried to get a response from her on anything substantive….zero.
Great idea re: a Regional Parks Service, George. And thanks to Edwin Grieve for recalling the inactive bylaw that may open a path for moving forward. Sadly, prior to the election of our current Courtenay Council and CVRD board/management team, progressive ideas and plans of action were hard to find in the valley. Cases in point: chronic problems with water, sewer, air quality, and willful ignorance about the causes of each. (Talk about denying science, data and facts!) Too many of the old-guard stood guard against progress. So now everyone is playing catch up here in the Comox Valley. Those in leadership positions have a lot to do to bring us up-to-date. But I’m more confident than ever that, with public support and education, we can get catch up. Decafnation is certainly doing its share to keep us informed. Thanks!
Regional Parks Service ?
Do we really need another Organization and it’s Comitte’s for Regional Parks.
As a Park user over many years I have noticed an improvement in R Park care
since the Regional District took over or were given authority over
our Parks. EG NE Woods, Seal Bay..
More Comitte’s would lead to more arguments and Local Political squabbles.
Could the Mack Laing Heritage Society submit a late application for the grant stating the City of Comox failed to do this for the people of Comox. If nothing else, it would bring the public light back on the problem.
Could the Mack Laing Heritage Trust be included as an item at the next election and let the people of Comox have a direct say.
Debbie — I don’t think NGOs can apply for the infrastructure funding. But I do like your idea of putting the Mack Laing Trust agreement on the ballot as a referendum in 2022. We’re assuming, of course, that the Comox councillors will all continue to bury their heads in the sand.