Electoral area directors deferred amended application to a future meeting, want province to explain licensing rules
On Merville groundwater extraction it’s deja vu all over again
It was standing room only in the Comox Valley Regional District Civic Room on Jan. 9 as about 80 people squeezed into the Civic Room for the Electoral Areas Services Committee (EASC) meeting.
This is an uncommon turnout for such meetings, but many people have uncommonly strong feelings about protecting shared local water resources.
After the new EASC chair and vice-chair were acclaimed (Richard Hardy and Edwin Grieve, respectively), and Ed Hoeppner made a presentation on Hornby Island’s composting toilet residuals, the committee heard from Bruce Gibbons, the tireless leader of the Merville Water Guardians, opposing yet another iteration of Scott MacKenzie and Regula Heynck’s application to extract groundwater at 2400 and 2410 Sackville Road.
“It was, and still is, obvious that the residents, farmers and elected officials of the Comox Valley do not want the water from the Comox Valley aquifer to be extracted and sold for commercial profit.” — Bruce Gibbons, January 9
As we reminded you last week, way back in 2017 MacKenzie and Heynck received a conditional license from the province to extract water for bottling. Their 2018 zoning amendment application to the CVRD board, requesting that the Board add “water bottling” to the list of permitted uses on the property, was denied.
The initial conditional license was supposed to expire Dec.31, 2020, if the project wasn’t up and running by then. As Gibbons explained, “On January 4th, 2021, … I was told the licensee would be given 30 days notice and then the cancellation process would commence.”
However, it was never cancelled. As noted in the CVRD staff report on the matter: “In 2022, the applicant applied to the province to amend the above-noted conditional water licence to change the purpose of the water use from ‘industrial (fresh water bottling)’ to ‘waterworks (water sales and water delivery).’”
The CVRD staff report prepared for the meeting recommended that the amended application, which would essentially accept this enterprise as a “home occupation” under OCP bylaws, be accepted: “The activities of bulk water treatment, storage, transport, and sales are permitted on the subject property, under conditions of a Home Occupation which is a permitted accessory use within the subject property’s Rural Eight (RU-8) zone.”
“We can’t live without water”
Gibbons reminded the committee of the recent droughts experienced on Vancouver Island:
• Total rainfall from July 4th to Oct 22nd was 7.8 mm; normal is 155 mm.
• A Stage 4 drought was declared for East Vancouver Island again from mid-September to mid-October 2021, and a Stage 5 drought from mid-October to early November.
• Total rainfall for October was 22.2 mm. The normal is 122.8 mm. October is historically one of our wettest months of the year, so 18% of normal rainfall should be a serious concern.
“Combine these drought statistics with the rapidly and significantly receding Comox Glacier, and water security in the Comox Valley is at risk,” he said.
He wrapped up by imploring the committee to deny the application for the amendment to the original water license, which drew a standing ovation from the audience.
“The CVRD has been transparent, thoughtful, respectful and thorough” in handling this case, which has generated much interest from the public, said CVRD CAO Russell Dyson, after reminding attendees that the CVRD has jurisdiction only to regulate use and development on the surface of land; groundwater extraction and water licensing are a provincial matter.
What is a home occupation?
CVRD senior planner Jodi MacLean explained that the zoning bylaw doesn’t prohibit bulk water treatment, storage, transport, and sales on the subject property if it is designated as a home occupation.
Edwin Grieve stated that “We have an obligation to follow our own zoning,” but questioned why the K’ómoks First Nation had not been consulted on this latest amendment. “I’m very underwhelmed by the [lack of] support we’re getting from our provincial government,” he said, referring both to this matter and the issue of ship-breaking in Royston.
Director Daniel Arbour questioned whether staff were taking too broad a view. If carried to extremes, he wondered, “Could a nuclear facility be considered a home occupation?” under this kind of interpretation.
He was being facetious, but the point was made. He listed a number of activities that are explicitly acceptable on RU-8 properties like MacKenzie and Heynck’s: agricultural use, plant nursery and greenhouse, riding academy, etc. “I see water processing as a much more industrial/commercial kind of activity that has broader impacts,” he commented.
Dyson noted that a home occupation is general in nature, and that the CVRD could get a legal opinion on the matter.
MacKenzie allowed to speak
Toward the end of the discussion, Scott MacKenzie, who was participating remotely, was invited to speak, to the initial displeasure of Gibbons and the audience (MacKenzie had not made an official delegation request).
MacKenzie’s remarks included the words “bias and slander,” “defrauded,” “coercion,” “lynching,” and “outraged,” as well as a demand for Edwin Grieve to recuse himself.
The committee voted unanimously to defer the matter to a future meeting of the EASC to obtain a legal opinion regarding the definition of home occupation and to request the province of BC to come before the committee to explain its role and responsibility regarding water extraction. The EASC directors also want to confirm the position of K’ómoks First Nation on the amendment.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
Merville water bottling issue returns to the CVRD, highlights provincial water policies
The Comox Valley Electoral Areas Service Commission will consider on Monday an amended application for water bottling operations in Merville and draw attention to larger water policy issues in British Columbia
What’s dire: the lack of Comox subdivisions or climate change and gradual deforestation?
A Comox Valley developer is suing the Town of Comox because his permits to cut down trees and build more single-family homes haven’t been issued as fast as he’s wanted and because the town wants a wider walking trail through the property
The Week: Ken Grant fined by Elections BC and Parksville confronted by development, water issues
Another Comox Councillor was fined by Elections BC for violating BC elections laws, plus Parksville’s water supply is unable to meet provincial requirements for summer water flow in the Englishman River let alone provide water for a proposed 800-unit development
Courtenay Council announces its regional district line-up and other appointments
Courtenay City Council’s annual appointments announced after a short delay
The Week: Comox, Cumberland appointments pass, but no word on Courtenay … yet
Cumberland and Comox municipal councils approve their mayor’s annual appointments, but Courtenay was a no show at its inaugural meeting. Is there conflict behind the scenes?
No fireworks as Comox Council approves mayors’ appointments
The newly-elected and the recently re-elected members of the Comox Council were all on the same page at its inaugural meeting this week and confirmed first-time Mayor Nicole Minions’ appointments to the regional board
The Week: Valley councils begin new terms, but will Comox ignore voters?
Dr. Jonathan Kerr topped the polls with voters, but will that resonate at the Comox Town Council as it is poised to approve new Mayor Nicole Minions’ appointments and assignments?
Join the discussion Oct. 3 about food system security in the Comox Valley
The Watershed Sentinel magazine is hosting a zoom webinar Oct. 3 on food system security in the Comox Valley
Comox Valley local government elections ramping up for Oct. 15 vote
Comox Valley voters will elect new councilors, mayors, regional district representatives, school board members and Island Trust reps on Oct. 15. Find out who’s running for what … and why. Decafnation returns to shine more light on local government issues and candidates
Comox Valley Nature webinar to discuss effect of climate change on marine life
Comox Valley Nature lecture to discuss how this summer’s heatwave killed off billions of sea life and the future for marine ecosystems
We are zoned for home industry, permitting us to draw a small amount from this recharging aquifer to engage in economic development as stated in the cvrd oxo . Your greatest fear will come to fruition…. We will prove you all ignorant to the facts.
There was a segment last week on CBC’s On The Island about how the smaller glaciers in BC are shrinking more rapidly than previously predicted. The interviewee, professor Brian Menounos (also a Canada Research Chair in Glacier Change) said, “The beautiful Comox Glacier is not long for this world.”
When the science clearly shows that our water resources are threatened, and dwindling, it beggars belief that individuals or corporations can still be permitted (or, in this case it almost seems, ENCOURAGED) by the province to extract water from the aquifer for personal gain.
Humans have got to start being smarter. And we need to keep on speaking out against our own self-destruction.
I too was at the CVRD meeting on Jan. 9th. There was and still are a few questions left un answered. There has been little or no studies of the volumes of or the rate of recovery of the aquafer. Most wells in the area are shallow 15 – 30 feet and have been working fine for almost 100 years. It would not take much drop in the aquifer to affect wells this shallow. Considering that the people have been iving in the area long before any water bottling buisssnes, should not these people and their families come first.
I attended that meeting, and it is difficult to understand why this license is still being considered. The water in question does not belong to Mr. McKenzie, but is a community aquifer. He would be encroaching on the water supply of the community, for the purpose of increasing his own income.
Hear, hear! The very idea of being able, theoretically, to obtain a license to tap into an aquifer for one’s personal profit, seems bizarre. However, under the Water Sustainability Act (ironic name), which contains “sustainability regulations”, these seem to have nothing to do with private profit from community resources nor an awareness of measures required to assess the sustainability of resources, such as surface and ground water. Although the Act is only seven years old, it seems hopelessly inadequate already. One would think that this government would be interested in a reexamination of the Act to truly address sustainability from a broader perspective.
In the meantime, citizen protests and actions look to be the best recourse for drawing attention to the issue while blocking individual greed in pursuit of profits from precious and limited resources belonging to all.
As I understand this saga, someone in the provincial bureaucracy disopbeyed their own regulations to extend this application. Is there NO accountability in the bureaucracy? That issue alone should be enough to resolve this. It is an illegal amendment.
Pleaase sign me bureaucracy gone berserk.
This legal football with it’s wide interpretation of home occupation and the lack of provincial participation could cost the taxpayers a pile of money. A shame to let the lawyers get hold of it. The concept that this application is simply wrong on an ethical level seems to have escaped the applicants. Time to listen to your neighbours.
The province should be involved. Simply put, there should be no extraction of water from any aquifer anywhere in BC for private profit. I wonder what Ronna-Rae Leonard would have to say about this?
Bruce Gibbons should be applauded for his work in protecting this precious natural resource. Commercial water extraction is a form of mining and should be treated as such. The designation of Home Occupation surely wouldn’t allow someone a mining licence in that area.
We need to protect our water.
Legal opinions are just that — opinions. A judicial decision is the only one that defines what is. Whaat those in attendance don’t appreciate is that the province controls grind water. Was Ronna Rae Leonard at the meeting? Was she asked about this and if so what was her response? The REAL TAP is in Victoria.